Biodiversity in extreme places, including areas that are rarely studied. Biodiversity in extreme places, Including That areas are rarely studied. But we had quite understand some things. But We Had Quite understand Some Things. Here on the life of the seabed. Here on the life of the seabed.
There is a question of how the creatures scavenger (scavengers) at the bottom of the ocean to survive with so little food that can get to the ocean floor? There is a question of how the creatures scavenger (scavengers) at the bottom of the ocean to survive with so little food cans That get to the ocean floor?
Coelacanth Coelacanth
Let us imagine, when a dead tuna fish in the ocean, the carcass may not have the opportunity to basics. Let us imagine, Pls a dead tuna fish in the ocean, the carcass May not have the opportunity to basics. On the way, he can be struck by a colony of fish and drop it hopes the watchman on the seabed. On the way, he cans be struck by a colony of fish and drop it Hopes the Watchman on the seabed.
To understand this, let us imagine the ocean floor as a pole. To understand this, let us imagine the ocean floor as a pole. Sea level as the top pole, while the base is embedded in the floor of the ocean floor. Sea level as the top pole, while the base is embedded in the floor of the ocean floor. What would we find on this pole? What would We find on this pole?
First, we recognize that may directly is the number of animals are also less and less. First, We Recognize That May directly is the number of animals are less and less Also. Aldea et al (2008) for example, found that more and in fewer and fewer types of shells (gastropods and bivalves). Aldea et al (2008) for example, found That more and in fewer and fewer types of shells (gastropods and bivalves).
It seems that our problem has been missed. It Seems That our problem has been missed. Animals that live near the surface if it is too much when they die, their bodies sink to the bottom. Animals That Live near the surface if it is too much Pls They die, Their bodies sink to the bottom.
In fact, Drazen (2002) found that scavenger fish in the sea floor, not at all affected by variations in the number of animals drowned. In fact, Drazen (2002) found This scavenger fish in the sea floor, not at all affected by Variations in the number of animals Drowned. Whether there are 1,000 or only 20 fish that reach the base, these fish do not be greedy or be thrifty food. Whether there are 1.000 or 20 fish That only reach the base, these fish do not be greedy or be Thrifty food. The balance appears to be very strong at the bottom of the ocean. The balance appears to be very strong at the bottom of the ocean.
The sea bottom living animals calm and unpretentious. The sea bottom-living animals calm and unpretentious. Almost all felt that even tortured if rising near the surface. Almost all felt That event Tortured if rising near the surface. For example, echinus Echinus larvae can not develop if pressure is not like in the bottom of the sea (Tyler and Young, 1998). For example, echinus Echinus larvae cans not develop if pressure is not like in the bottom of the sea (Tyler and Young, 1998).
It looks like it, cool calm. It looks like it, cool calm. But wait. But wait. Not that easy. Not That easy. Some stealth seabed often patrol beat up residents. Some stealth seabed Often patrol beat up residents. Yes, predation does occur in the bottom of the ocean. Yes, predation does occur in the bottom of the ocean.
Kemp et al (2006) pursue the phantom of this without result. Kemp et al (2006) pursue the phantom of this without result. And they attribute the decline of crab scavenger (Munidopsis crassa) on the seabed phantom named Benthoctopus sp, octopus seabed. And They attribute the decline of crab scavenger (Munidopsis crassa) on the seabed phantom named Benthoctopus sp, octopus seabed. But do not be happy if the Pirates of the Caribbean had suddenly come true. But do not be happy if the Pirates of the Caribbean Had Suddenly come true.
Crab scavenger, scavenger Munidopsis Crab, Munidopsis
Benthoctopus not a big octopus. Benthoctopus not a big octopus. Like the other inhabitants of the sea floor, he was small (Polloni et al, 1979). Like the other inhabitants of the sea floor, he was small (Polloni et al, 1979). Although small, he is quite able to prey on unsuspecting crab. Although small, he is Quite Able to prey on unsuspecting crab.
Seabed octopus, Octopus sp Benthoctopus the sea floor, Benthoctopus sp
Seabed filled by the scavenger, a little predators and some species that are not clear. Seabed filled by the scavenger, a Little That predators and Some species are not clear. It says it is not clear because we are not able to determine whether she scavenger or a predator, or other. It says it is not clear Because We Are not Able to determine whether she scavenger or a predator, or other. Scientists are very careful in classifying animals seabed. Scientists are very careful in classifying animals seabed.
Britton and Morton (1994) for example, do not want to admit that an animal is a scavenger if he does not see immediately the animal is approaching or scavenged carcasses. Britton and Morton (1994) for example, do not Want To admit That an animal is a scavenger if he does not see Immediately the animal is approaching or scavenged carcasses.
Bottom of the sea urchin, Echinus Bottom of the sea urchin, Echinus
Perhaps we are too rushed to say that the animals on the seabed all small, flat and silly. Perhaps We Are too rushed to say That the animals on the seabed all small, flat and silly. Seabed surveys, particularly jagged terrain, hard to do, so although it Hawaiian seabed more than 4000 meters, only 2000 feet away the ability of researchers to achieve it (Borets, 1986). Seabed surveys, particularly jagged terrain, hard to do, so although it Hawaiian seabed More Than 4000 meters, only 2000 feet away the ability of Researchers to Achieve it (Borets, 1986).
And it is true would not we in a hurry. And it is true We Would not in a hurry. Most of the scavenger fish, the greater its size when getting to the bottom of the ocean. Most of the scavenger fish, the Greater its size Pls getting to the bottom of the ocean. This is what makes Anderson (2005) suspect that Symenchelys parasitica, is not a scavenger. This is what makes Anderson (2005) Symenchelys parasitica That suspect, is not a scavenger. This fish is unique because of its size would shrink as the sea deepened. This fish is unique Because of its size Would shrink as the sea deepened. Analysis of stomach contents showed that he indeed scavenger. Analysis of stomach contents showed That he indeed scavenger.
Some argue that the seabed animals actually granted. Some argue That Actually granted the seabed animals. No one size larger or smaller. No one size larger or Smaller. Coincidence, we obtain samples at the surface is young fish, while the bottom is his father mbah fish or fish. Coincidence, We obtain samples at the surface is young fish, while the bottom is his father mbah fish or fish.
Seabed research methods generally use cameras that emit light that attract fish. Generally Seabed research methods use cameras emit light That That attract fish. Children of fish, at least in research Raymond and Widder (2007) proved not like the glittering night life (well, at the bottom of the sea is always the middle of the night anyway). Children of fish, at least in research Raymond and Widder (2007) proved not like the Glittering nightlife (well, at the bottom of the sea is always the middle of the night anyway).
So species that can be captured in the seabed just mbahnya fish, although children and grandchildren might be fun to play. That species cans So be captured in the seabed just mbahnya fish, although children and grandchildren Might be fun to play.
Squid tentacles with eyes at the end of the squid tentacles with eyes at the end
When we talk about the diversity of species, it seems we must accept the research Carney (2005) if the animals on the seabed is almost a reversal of the animals near the surface of the sea. When We talk about the diversity of species, it Seems We must accept the research Carney (2005) if the animals on the seabed is Almost a reversal of the animals near the surface of the sea.
We either look at the ocean as a pole or an inverted pyramid, we should view the ocean as two pyramids, one inverted and one upright. Either We look at the ocean as a pole or an inverted pyramid, Should We view the ocean as two pyramids, one inverted and one upright.
The problem is whether these two adjacent pyramids, base to meet each other, or meet the peak. The problem is whether these two adjacent pyramids, base to meet EACH other, or meet the peak. Rex (1981) have shown that biodiversity will be most in the middle depths. Rex (1981) have shown That biodiversity will from some of most in the middle depths. Both the base so as diamond pyramid met. Both the base so as diamond pyramid meth.
Deep-sea fish Deep-sea fish
Now our conclusion is that, when talking numbers, the number of animals getting to the bottom of the sea the less, but not necessarily its size. Now our conclusion is that, Pls talking numbers, the number of animals getting to the bottom of the sea the less, but not necessarily its size. When it comes to size, some species are much smaller, some are actually bigger (Collins et al, 2005). When it comes to size, Some species are much Smaller, Some Are Actually WASHINGTON (Collins et al, 2005). And when it comes to diversity, the most diverse species is at medium depth. And Pls it comes to diversity, the most diverse species is at medium depth.
Thus the evolution of forms of life. Thus the evolution of forms of life. If a species is given the option to stay at the base, in the middle or at the surface of the ocean, it would seem more likely that he chose to live on the ocean floor. If a species is given the option to stay at the base, in the middle or at the surface of the ocean, it would seem more likely, That he chose to live on the ocean floor.
Why not, here a little predators, the predators eat just enough, the needs of the species are similar, he's eating and mating to taste, and the people here can live idly waiting for the gold down from the sky. Why not, here a little predators, the predators eat just Enough, the needs of the species are similar, he's eating and mating to taste, and the people here live cans idly waiting for the gold down from the sky.
Maybe gold is a whale, which can be consumed up to 50 years old, can be said for animal life seabed. Maybe gold is a whale, the which cans be consumed up to 50 years old, can be said for animal life seabed. At least this is the pressure of natural selection that explains why the ancient fish, which has existed hundreds of millions of years, the legendary coelacanth, was not evolved at all. At least this is the pressure of natural selection, That explains why the ancient fish, the which has existed hundreds of Millions of years, the legendary coelacanth, was not evolved at all.
Then the question, why the coelacanth seems not evolve. Then the question, why the coelacanth Seems not evolve. The answer is because the coelacanth had very few mutations because it lives in the deep ocean. The answer is Because the coelacanth Had Very Few mutations Because it lives in the deep ocean. What do you expect from animals that live in caves under the sea? What do you Expect from animals live in Caves That under the sea?
Radiation barely reach it, so the mutation is very rare. Barely Radiation reach it, so the mutation is very rare. When the mutation alone is extremely rare, what is going on by natural selection? When the mutation alone is extremely rare, what is going on by natural selection? Coelacanth predictions prove evolutionary theory that mutations and natural selection are two factors that build of evolution so that species that do not have mutations and natural selection will not evolve. Coelacanth Predictions PROVE That evolutionary theory mutations and natural selection are two factors That build of evolution of species so That That do not have mutations and natural selection will from not evolve.
At least faced by Coelacanth mutation is sufficient to distinguish the modern coelacanth, which is found in Sulawesi and the ancient coelacanth, which exist in the fossil, had a different phenotype. At least faced by Coelacanth mutation is sufficient to distinguish the modern coelacanth, the which is found in Sulawesi and the ancient coelacanth, the which exist in the fossil, Had a different phenotype.
Species that live a Latimeridae family while a family coelacanthidae ancient coelacanth. That species live a family while a family Latimeridae coelacanthidae ancient coelacanth. This difference lies in the differences in sizes, fossil coelacanthidae smaller than latimeridae. This difference lies in the differences in sizes, fossil coelacanthidae Smaller Than latimeridae.
In addition, some internal structures not found in the fossil latimeridae coelacanthidae. In Addition, Some internal structures not found in the fossil latimeridae coelacanthidae. Moreover, the scales cosmoid on modern species and modified thinner than the scales of ancient fossils found in thicker. Moreover, the scales cosmoid on modern species and modified Thinner Than the scales of ancient Fossils found in thicker.
But more obvious is the fin. But more obvious is the fin. Fins latimeridae was already highly modified. Fins latimeridae was already highly modified. Fossil coelacanthidae unfortunately incomplete. Fossil coelacanthidae unfortunately incomplete. Fins not joined as fossils, so scientists do not know. Fins not joined as Fossils, so scientists do not know.
Fortunately, a newly discovered species of fossil coelacanth, and named Shoshonia arctoperyx. Fortunately, a newly discovered species of fossil coelacanth, and named Shoshonia arctoperyx. According to its discoverers, Friedman et al (2007) fossil coelacanth fin is very different from the fin Latimeria. According to its discoverers, Friedman et al (2007) fossil coelacanth fin is very different from the fin Latimeria.
Zimmer (2007) makes the following picture to illustrate, consider the differences in these fins. Zimmer (2007) makes the Following picture to illustrate, Consider the differences in these fins. Zimmer said that even if the status of a living fossil in Latimeria is not worth more bears, these animals are too much changed from their ancestors in the past. Zimmer said that even if the status of a living fossil in Latimeria is not worth more bears, these animals are too much changed from Their ancestors in the past.
Note the fins and Soshonia Latimeria in the left side (credit: Zimmer, 2007) Note the fins and Soshonia Latimeria in the left side (credit: Zimmer, 2007)
Another question, why fish is said to save the sea floor when it was clear these greedy fish. Another question, why fish is said to save the sea floor it was clear these Pls greedy fish. Some even eat prey larger than itself, in a single swallow. Some even eat larger prey Than itself, in a single swallow.
It's certainly wrong, because such fish exist between sea surface and seabed, rather than on the seabed. It's certainly wrong, Because Such fish exist Between sea surface and seabed, rather Than on the seabed. The fish in the sea only in but not deep enough to get to the bottom. The fish in the sea only in deep but not Enough to get to the bottom.
Source: Source:
einsteinanakcerdas.blogspot.com einsteinanakcerdas.blogs
There is a question of how the creatures scavenger (scavengers) at the bottom of the ocean to survive with so little food that can get to the ocean floor? There is a question of how the creatures scavenger (scavengers) at the bottom of the ocean to survive with so little food cans That get to the ocean floor?
Coelacanth Coelacanth
Let us imagine, when a dead tuna fish in the ocean, the carcass may not have the opportunity to basics. Let us imagine, Pls a dead tuna fish in the ocean, the carcass May not have the opportunity to basics. On the way, he can be struck by a colony of fish and drop it hopes the watchman on the seabed. On the way, he cans be struck by a colony of fish and drop it Hopes the Watchman on the seabed.
To understand this, let us imagine the ocean floor as a pole. To understand this, let us imagine the ocean floor as a pole. Sea level as the top pole, while the base is embedded in the floor of the ocean floor. Sea level as the top pole, while the base is embedded in the floor of the ocean floor. What would we find on this pole? What would We find on this pole?
First, we recognize that may directly is the number of animals are also less and less. First, We Recognize That May directly is the number of animals are less and less Also. Aldea et al (2008) for example, found that more and in fewer and fewer types of shells (gastropods and bivalves). Aldea et al (2008) for example, found That more and in fewer and fewer types of shells (gastropods and bivalves).
It seems that our problem has been missed. It Seems That our problem has been missed. Animals that live near the surface if it is too much when they die, their bodies sink to the bottom. Animals That Live near the surface if it is too much Pls They die, Their bodies sink to the bottom.
In fact, Drazen (2002) found that scavenger fish in the sea floor, not at all affected by variations in the number of animals drowned. In fact, Drazen (2002) found This scavenger fish in the sea floor, not at all affected by Variations in the number of animals Drowned. Whether there are 1,000 or only 20 fish that reach the base, these fish do not be greedy or be thrifty food. Whether there are 1.000 or 20 fish That only reach the base, these fish do not be greedy or be Thrifty food. The balance appears to be very strong at the bottom of the ocean. The balance appears to be very strong at the bottom of the ocean.
The sea bottom living animals calm and unpretentious. The sea bottom-living animals calm and unpretentious. Almost all felt that even tortured if rising near the surface. Almost all felt That event Tortured if rising near the surface. For example, echinus Echinus larvae can not develop if pressure is not like in the bottom of the sea (Tyler and Young, 1998). For example, echinus Echinus larvae cans not develop if pressure is not like in the bottom of the sea (Tyler and Young, 1998).
It looks like it, cool calm. It looks like it, cool calm. But wait. But wait. Not that easy. Not That easy. Some stealth seabed often patrol beat up residents. Some stealth seabed Often patrol beat up residents. Yes, predation does occur in the bottom of the ocean. Yes, predation does occur in the bottom of the ocean.
Kemp et al (2006) pursue the phantom of this without result. Kemp et al (2006) pursue the phantom of this without result. And they attribute the decline of crab scavenger (Munidopsis crassa) on the seabed phantom named Benthoctopus sp, octopus seabed. And They attribute the decline of crab scavenger (Munidopsis crassa) on the seabed phantom named Benthoctopus sp, octopus seabed. But do not be happy if the Pirates of the Caribbean had suddenly come true. But do not be happy if the Pirates of the Caribbean Had Suddenly come true.
Crab scavenger, scavenger Munidopsis Crab, Munidopsis
Benthoctopus not a big octopus. Benthoctopus not a big octopus. Like the other inhabitants of the sea floor, he was small (Polloni et al, 1979). Like the other inhabitants of the sea floor, he was small (Polloni et al, 1979). Although small, he is quite able to prey on unsuspecting crab. Although small, he is Quite Able to prey on unsuspecting crab.
Seabed octopus, Octopus sp Benthoctopus the sea floor, Benthoctopus sp
Seabed filled by the scavenger, a little predators and some species that are not clear. Seabed filled by the scavenger, a Little That predators and Some species are not clear. It says it is not clear because we are not able to determine whether she scavenger or a predator, or other. It says it is not clear Because We Are not Able to determine whether she scavenger or a predator, or other. Scientists are very careful in classifying animals seabed. Scientists are very careful in classifying animals seabed.
Britton and Morton (1994) for example, do not want to admit that an animal is a scavenger if he does not see immediately the animal is approaching or scavenged carcasses. Britton and Morton (1994) for example, do not Want To admit That an animal is a scavenger if he does not see Immediately the animal is approaching or scavenged carcasses.
Bottom of the sea urchin, Echinus Bottom of the sea urchin, Echinus
Perhaps we are too rushed to say that the animals on the seabed all small, flat and silly. Perhaps We Are too rushed to say That the animals on the seabed all small, flat and silly. Seabed surveys, particularly jagged terrain, hard to do, so although it Hawaiian seabed more than 4000 meters, only 2000 feet away the ability of researchers to achieve it (Borets, 1986). Seabed surveys, particularly jagged terrain, hard to do, so although it Hawaiian seabed More Than 4000 meters, only 2000 feet away the ability of Researchers to Achieve it (Borets, 1986).
And it is true would not we in a hurry. And it is true We Would not in a hurry. Most of the scavenger fish, the greater its size when getting to the bottom of the ocean. Most of the scavenger fish, the Greater its size Pls getting to the bottom of the ocean. This is what makes Anderson (2005) suspect that Symenchelys parasitica, is not a scavenger. This is what makes Anderson (2005) Symenchelys parasitica That suspect, is not a scavenger. This fish is unique because of its size would shrink as the sea deepened. This fish is unique Because of its size Would shrink as the sea deepened. Analysis of stomach contents showed that he indeed scavenger. Analysis of stomach contents showed That he indeed scavenger.
Some argue that the seabed animals actually granted. Some argue That Actually granted the seabed animals. No one size larger or smaller. No one size larger or Smaller. Coincidence, we obtain samples at the surface is young fish, while the bottom is his father mbah fish or fish. Coincidence, We obtain samples at the surface is young fish, while the bottom is his father mbah fish or fish.
Seabed research methods generally use cameras that emit light that attract fish. Generally Seabed research methods use cameras emit light That That attract fish. Children of fish, at least in research Raymond and Widder (2007) proved not like the glittering night life (well, at the bottom of the sea is always the middle of the night anyway). Children of fish, at least in research Raymond and Widder (2007) proved not like the Glittering nightlife (well, at the bottom of the sea is always the middle of the night anyway).
So species that can be captured in the seabed just mbahnya fish, although children and grandchildren might be fun to play. That species cans So be captured in the seabed just mbahnya fish, although children and grandchildren Might be fun to play.
Squid tentacles with eyes at the end of the squid tentacles with eyes at the end
When we talk about the diversity of species, it seems we must accept the research Carney (2005) if the animals on the seabed is almost a reversal of the animals near the surface of the sea. When We talk about the diversity of species, it Seems We must accept the research Carney (2005) if the animals on the seabed is Almost a reversal of the animals near the surface of the sea.
We either look at the ocean as a pole or an inverted pyramid, we should view the ocean as two pyramids, one inverted and one upright. Either We look at the ocean as a pole or an inverted pyramid, Should We view the ocean as two pyramids, one inverted and one upright.
The problem is whether these two adjacent pyramids, base to meet each other, or meet the peak. The problem is whether these two adjacent pyramids, base to meet EACH other, or meet the peak. Rex (1981) have shown that biodiversity will be most in the middle depths. Rex (1981) have shown That biodiversity will from some of most in the middle depths. Both the base so as diamond pyramid met. Both the base so as diamond pyramid meth.
Deep-sea fish Deep-sea fish
Now our conclusion is that, when talking numbers, the number of animals getting to the bottom of the sea the less, but not necessarily its size. Now our conclusion is that, Pls talking numbers, the number of animals getting to the bottom of the sea the less, but not necessarily its size. When it comes to size, some species are much smaller, some are actually bigger (Collins et al, 2005). When it comes to size, Some species are much Smaller, Some Are Actually WASHINGTON (Collins et al, 2005). And when it comes to diversity, the most diverse species is at medium depth. And Pls it comes to diversity, the most diverse species is at medium depth.
Thus the evolution of forms of life. Thus the evolution of forms of life. If a species is given the option to stay at the base, in the middle or at the surface of the ocean, it would seem more likely that he chose to live on the ocean floor. If a species is given the option to stay at the base, in the middle or at the surface of the ocean, it would seem more likely, That he chose to live on the ocean floor.
Why not, here a little predators, the predators eat just enough, the needs of the species are similar, he's eating and mating to taste, and the people here can live idly waiting for the gold down from the sky. Why not, here a little predators, the predators eat just Enough, the needs of the species are similar, he's eating and mating to taste, and the people here live cans idly waiting for the gold down from the sky.
Maybe gold is a whale, which can be consumed up to 50 years old, can be said for animal life seabed. Maybe gold is a whale, the which cans be consumed up to 50 years old, can be said for animal life seabed. At least this is the pressure of natural selection that explains why the ancient fish, which has existed hundreds of millions of years, the legendary coelacanth, was not evolved at all. At least this is the pressure of natural selection, That explains why the ancient fish, the which has existed hundreds of Millions of years, the legendary coelacanth, was not evolved at all.
Then the question, why the coelacanth seems not evolve. Then the question, why the coelacanth Seems not evolve. The answer is because the coelacanth had very few mutations because it lives in the deep ocean. The answer is Because the coelacanth Had Very Few mutations Because it lives in the deep ocean. What do you expect from animals that live in caves under the sea? What do you Expect from animals live in Caves That under the sea?
Radiation barely reach it, so the mutation is very rare. Barely Radiation reach it, so the mutation is very rare. When the mutation alone is extremely rare, what is going on by natural selection? When the mutation alone is extremely rare, what is going on by natural selection? Coelacanth predictions prove evolutionary theory that mutations and natural selection are two factors that build of evolution so that species that do not have mutations and natural selection will not evolve. Coelacanth Predictions PROVE That evolutionary theory mutations and natural selection are two factors That build of evolution of species so That That do not have mutations and natural selection will from not evolve.
At least faced by Coelacanth mutation is sufficient to distinguish the modern coelacanth, which is found in Sulawesi and the ancient coelacanth, which exist in the fossil, had a different phenotype. At least faced by Coelacanth mutation is sufficient to distinguish the modern coelacanth, the which is found in Sulawesi and the ancient coelacanth, the which exist in the fossil, Had a different phenotype.
Species that live a Latimeridae family while a family coelacanthidae ancient coelacanth. That species live a family while a family Latimeridae coelacanthidae ancient coelacanth. This difference lies in the differences in sizes, fossil coelacanthidae smaller than latimeridae. This difference lies in the differences in sizes, fossil coelacanthidae Smaller Than latimeridae.
In addition, some internal structures not found in the fossil latimeridae coelacanthidae. In Addition, Some internal structures not found in the fossil latimeridae coelacanthidae. Moreover, the scales cosmoid on modern species and modified thinner than the scales of ancient fossils found in thicker. Moreover, the scales cosmoid on modern species and modified Thinner Than the scales of ancient Fossils found in thicker.
But more obvious is the fin. But more obvious is the fin. Fins latimeridae was already highly modified. Fins latimeridae was already highly modified. Fossil coelacanthidae unfortunately incomplete. Fossil coelacanthidae unfortunately incomplete. Fins not joined as fossils, so scientists do not know. Fins not joined as Fossils, so scientists do not know.
Fortunately, a newly discovered species of fossil coelacanth, and named Shoshonia arctoperyx. Fortunately, a newly discovered species of fossil coelacanth, and named Shoshonia arctoperyx. According to its discoverers, Friedman et al (2007) fossil coelacanth fin is very different from the fin Latimeria. According to its discoverers, Friedman et al (2007) fossil coelacanth fin is very different from the fin Latimeria.
Zimmer (2007) makes the following picture to illustrate, consider the differences in these fins. Zimmer (2007) makes the Following picture to illustrate, Consider the differences in these fins. Zimmer said that even if the status of a living fossil in Latimeria is not worth more bears, these animals are too much changed from their ancestors in the past. Zimmer said that even if the status of a living fossil in Latimeria is not worth more bears, these animals are too much changed from Their ancestors in the past.
Note the fins and Soshonia Latimeria in the left side (credit: Zimmer, 2007) Note the fins and Soshonia Latimeria in the left side (credit: Zimmer, 2007)
Another question, why fish is said to save the sea floor when it was clear these greedy fish. Another question, why fish is said to save the sea floor it was clear these Pls greedy fish. Some even eat prey larger than itself, in a single swallow. Some even eat larger prey Than itself, in a single swallow.
It's certainly wrong, because such fish exist between sea surface and seabed, rather than on the seabed. It's certainly wrong, Because Such fish exist Between sea surface and seabed, rather Than on the seabed. The fish in the sea only in but not deep enough to get to the bottom. The fish in the sea only in deep but not Enough to get to the bottom.
Source: Source:
einsteinanakcerdas.blogspot.com einsteinanakcerdas.blogs
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar